The P30 status of Foel Penolau has
been confirmed for the following lists; Simms, Hewitts and Twmpau with Alan
Dawson as list author for the first two and Myrddyn Phillips list author of the
Twmpau.
Foel Penolau (SH 661 347 and SH 661 348) |
This hill’s P30 status also
affects the Tumps, the author of this list; Mark Jackson is not in immediate
receipt of these data, but I’m sure he will be made aware of the result and its
implication.
Foel Penolau was surveyed over
two days; 17th November and 26th November 2018, with the
first survey conducted with Aled Williams and this consisted of two bwlch data
sets on the hill to hill traverse and a data set taken on both the southerly
and northerly summit of this hill.
Whilst the second survey concentrated on the area of this hill’s bwlch
with a further seven data sets being taken.
The Ordnance Survey Interactive
Coverage Map hosted on the Geograph website gives a 588m spot height positioned
at SH 66058 34637, and this is the only spot height that appears on maps for
the area of this hill’s connecting bwlch to Moel Ysgyfarnogod (SH 658 345), and
when coupled with the 614m summit spot height gives this hill 26m of drop which
is insufficient for Simm, Hewitt and Twmpau status.
Two data sets were taken in the
area close to where this spot height appears on the ground, both on the hill to
hill traverse with each either side of a slight rise, these results appear
below (with all forthcoming results converted to OSGM15):
17.11.18: 586.826m at SH 66009 34640
26.11.18: 587.302m at SH 66064 34662
The conclusion from there data
is that the 588m spot height is positioned on the slight rise and therefore is dismissed
from this hill’s drop value.
The southern aspect of Foel
Penolau is impressive as it rises as a vertical cliff which over many years has
crumbled depositing large boulders at its base, and it is this boulder field
where the critical bwlch of Foel Penolau is positioned.
The Trimble GeoXH 6000 gathering data in the boulder field |
The boulder field is
complicated as large holes are evident, these are positioned beside and also
under many of these boulders, and therefore it was this boulder field that
first coined the term of whether a critical bwlch should be taken from an ant’s
or human’s perspective. I adopted an ant’s
perspective and took a series of measurement offsets to solid ground at the
base of each set-up position, in many instances these were to gaping holes
under the large boulders. However, one
data set was taken on to grass to where the land on the hill to hill traverse enters
the boulder field, this result is:
26.11.18: 583.370m at SH 66097 34731
The remaining data sets taken
at the bwlch were all in the boulder field and on the valley to valley
traverse, their results from west to east are:
26.11.18: 581.942m at SH 66091 34746
26.11.18: 582.411m at SH 66094 34739
17.11.18: 582.482m at SH 66099 34735
26.11.18: 582.176m at SH 66105 34730
26.11.18: 582.006m at SH 66117 34721
26.11.18: 581.725m at SH 66127 34717
Therefore the critical bwlch as
surveyed by the Trimble is positioned at SH 66099 34735 and its height is
582.482m. This is the position that Aled
and I surveyed on the 17.11.18.
|
Foel Penolau is given two 614m summits
of equal height on contemporary Ordnance Survey maps, their connecting bwlch
and both summits were also surveyed, resulting in:
17.11.18: 614.379m at SH 66145 34774 (southerly summit)
17.11.18: 604.482m at SH 66154 34788 (connecting bwlch
between summits)
17.11.18: 614.380m at SH 66184 34832 (northerly summit)
The 1mm difference between each
summit produced by the Trimble GeoXH 6000 is outside the tolerance levels
of this equipment and therefore they remain twin summits for now.
The Trimble GeoXH 6000 at the northerly summit of Foel Penolau |
Therefore the survey results
produced by the Trimble GeoXH 6000 for Foel Penolau are as follows:
614.4m summit at SH 66145 34774
and SH 66184 34832
582.5m bwlch at SH 66099 34735
With these values giving this
hill 31.9m of drop and confirming its reclassification to Simm, Hewitt and
Twmpau status.
Myrddyn Phillips (December
2018)
No comments:
Post a Comment