Introduction
I have approached a number of people to write articles, but if readers would like to contribute an article please contact me. The only two stipulations I make are that the article has to be hill related and that I don't end up in court through its publication! Otherwise the choice of subject matter is down to the Guest Contributor.
Guest Contributor – Alan Dawson
Surveying is a Doddle
I was very pleased to
hear that Myrddyn has splashed out and bought himself a new surveying gadget, a
top-of-the-range Trimble. I see this as good news all round. Good for Myrddyn
firstly, as I’m sure it will give him endless enjoyment and satisfaction and an
even greater incentive to get out in the hills, not that he needed it. Good for
me, because I’m hoping that Myrddyn will survey several hills that are on my
own surveying to-do list, particularly marginal Sims (600m summits) in Wales.
And good for the hill-bagging community in general, as he will be collecting a
trove of accurate hill data and making it publicly available for anyone
interested. He will be reclassifying some hills in his own lists, which I’m
sure he will find particularly satisfying. It wouldn't surprise me if he set
out to survey every Pedwar (Welsh 400-499m hill).
While I focus mainly on
hills over 600m, with a few lower ones thrown in, and Myrddyn on 400-499m hills,
with lots of lower ones too, this leaves a gap in between, the 500m hills. It
has been suggested, by a few of the usual suspects that the British 500m hills
could benefit from unification, along similar lines to the Sims. Currently the
500m hills (with a minimum 30m drop all round) fall into four categories: Welsh
Deweys, English Deweys, Donald Deweys (in Southern Scotland) and Highland
Fives. All these groups cover hills from 500-609.6m not 500-599.9m, so they are
not metric lists but are based on one metric threshold (500m) and one imperial
threshold (2000 feet). When considering Britain as a whole, this mixture of
lists and units adds up to a dog’s dinner with breakfast, lunch, pudding and
after-dinner mince thrown in. At least, it does for those tidy-minded and
pedantic metric enthusiasts who like unified hill lists. Not a large percentage
of the population admittedly, but enough to propose a single list of 500-599m
hills for the whole of Britain. Dewey baggers south of the border would no
doubt carry on as before, where the list of Deweys gives hill-starved baggers a
challenging target, but in Scotland, where few people climb 500m hills that are
not Marilyns or Humps, the unified list would effectively supersede the
Highland Fives.
This raises the tricky
but important issue of what to call such a unified set of hills. Several
possibilities have been floated across the email waves, such as Clems, Dodds,
Fives, Hifives, Quintos and Woodalls. While both Clem Clements and Rob Woodall
played important parts in researching the hills now called Highland Fives, the
consensus view is that it would not be appropriate for the unified list to have
any single person’s name. Many others have also contributed, including Mark
Jackson, Tony Payne, Michael Dewey of course, David Purchase (who compiled the
Donald Deweys) and John Kirk, who produced an immense work listing all the
hills over 500m with roughly 20m or more drop. The GJ Surveys team (John
Barnard, Graham Jackson and Myrddyn Phillips) have also contributed by
surveying several marginal Deweys and demoting quite a few. Various members of
the team who look after the Database of British and Irish Hills (DOBIH),
particularly Jim Bloomer and Chris Crocker, have also helped research and
refine the list.
My personal view is that
‘Fours’ is an uninspired choice for the list of 400m hills in England, while
‘Pedwars’ or ‘Pedwarau’ is a better name for the Welsh 400m hills because it
sounds more imaginative and distinctive for those of us who don’t speak Welsh.
Similarly, I am not enthused by the term ‘Highland Fives’ or its potential
successors ‘Fives’ or ‘Hifives’. The remaining two options, ‘Dodds’ and
‘Quintos’, need a little explanation. Dodds is derived from ‘Donald Deweys and
Deweys and Scotland’, thereby acknowledging the major contributions of Michael
Dewey and David Purchase. It is also a hilly-sounding name, although not many
of the 500m hills are actually called something Dodd. One argument against is
that it’s another D-word to add to the Donalds and New Donalds and Deweys and
Donald Deweys. Quintos is based on the Latin prefix for five, as in quintet, a
five-piece band, and quintessence, the classical but elusive fifth element,
along with air, fire, earth and water. In a notorious case of bad planning, the
London-based Asian-influenced rock band Quintessence had six members when they
started in 1969, so they were a sextet not a quintet. I don’t suppose this
nominative discrepancy bothered them much, as they were Hindus rather than
pedantic hill baggers, though the two faiths are theoretically not
incompatible.
Anyway, Dodds
is currently the favoured choice, though further consultation is currently
taking place amongst interested parties. So much for the name, what about the
hills? According to version 13.3 of DOBIH, there are 1336 of them, comprising
941 in Scotland, 227 in Wales and 168 in England. There are also five in the
Isle of Man and 186 in Ireland but, in line with the Sims, these would not be
part of the unified list of British hills (the Irish 500-599m hills would
presumably be called the Doddis).
Dodd, a 502m Dodd, with Skiddaw behind |
Quite a
bagging challenge then, but not an impossible one. There are 215 Marilyns and a
further 189 Humps included, leaving only 932 to mop up for anyone who has done
all the 500m-599m Humps. Only eight of these are 599m and only ten are 598m, so
not many are likely to be promoted to Sims. Two of these have already been
confirmed: last year I surveyed 599m Flasvein on Skye and found that it is
598.9m, and now Myrddyn has taken his Trimble up Whimble and found it to be
598.8m. Those OS surveyors were pretty accurate in most cases when they
bothered to go walking in the hills, but now that they stick to planes or
offices they’re not quite so good.
Apart from
the name, another issue is that of overall responsibility for the unified list.
Michael Dewey is still looking after his list, but the Scottish hills present a
much bigger maintenance and editing task. To date the DOBIH team have taken
responsibility for the Highland Fives, and may continue in that role for the
Dodds, but there are some advantages in having a specific person as hill list
editor, as there are inevitably cases, in any list, where subjective judgements
are required about hill names and sometimes hill status. Precise surveys can
remove almost all uncertainty about height and drop, but there will always be
highly marginal cases where editorial judgement is required, and the vast
majority of these hills will remain unsurveyed for the foreseeable future.
Map-based research will continue to play a key role, and the inconsistencies
and vagaries of OS mapping mean that subjective judgements will continue to
play a small but important part in hill listings.
Myrddyn’s new
Trimble will be a huge asset to him and to hill baggers in general, but it
would take multiple Myrddyns (a vaguely uncomfortable image) with multiple
Trimbles in multiple lifetimes before the full and final truth of British hills
could be revealed. So there is really a need for another Trimble-wielder to
focus on the British 500-599m hills, whatever they end up being called. A
pedantic Hindu surveyor with lots of reincarnations could be particularly
useful. In the meantime, there are a multitude of small truths out there
waiting to be revealed, and I have no doubt that Myrddyn will have the time of
his life uncovering new hill data, for the benefit of all who are suitably
receptive.
To access the RHB Marilyn News Centre website and Alan’s survey results using a Leica
RX1250 GPS click {here}
No comments:
Post a Comment